Zone 2 Easy Run – Building Consistency One Step at a Time

Road to TCS TO Waterfront 42K – 2025

Today was Build Phase 1 / Week 3 / Run 1-a 30-minute Zone 2 easy run. I’ll admit it: my head was already thinking about tomorrow’s time trial. But I reminded myself that every run deserves presence, not just the ones with the word “test” in them. I didn’t do much by way of pre-run fueling-just 500ml of Nuun to hydrate. My intention, as always, was to live in the basement of Zone 2. You can tell me if I succeeded, but subjectively, I felt coasty. (I’m coining that word now.)

Heart rate zone chart showing 87.6% of run time in Zone 2 and 12.1% in Zone 1 during a Zone 2 easy run on July 22, 2025.

The cool 13°C morning definitely helped. I was locked in early and found myself in a rhythm that bordered on autopilot. That said, I did drift a little faster than prescribed at times. A couple of gentle mental nudges helped me pull it back without breaking stride.The real surprise? The run ended sooner than expected. I felt strong. In fact, I’ve been feeling strong quite a lot lately-and while part of me expects it, another part still marvels at the sensation. Maybe fit really does happen when you stay consistent.

📊 Coach’s Corner

Let’s break down the numbers and see what they have to say.

Workout Goal:

30 minutes in low to mid Zone 2 (7:13–7:40 min/km)

Execution Overview:

MetricValue
Duration30:26
Distance4.46 km
Avg Pace6:50/km
NGP6:47/km
rTSS / hrTSS45 / 28
IF (pace) / IF (HR)0.91 / 0.71
Pa:HR6.65%
Avg HR141 bpm
Max HR148 bpm
Elevation Gain94 m
Avg Cadence165 spm

Heart Rate Zones

  • Zone 2: 87.6% (26:39)
  • Zone 1: 12.1% (3:41)

You executed beautifully. Even though your pace exceeded the prescribed range, your heart rate stayed exactly where it should be-with over 87% of the time spent in Zone 2. A Pa:HR of 6.65% also supports aerobic efficiency. The bump in rTSS vs hrTSS reflects that minor overachieving pace but doesn’t suggest overreaching. Your cadence was solid at 165 spm, and VAM of 185 m/h indicates solid climbing strength.

The IF (HR) of 0.71 shows this stayed well within endurance effort-even if your legs were feeling peppy.


📊 Lap Metrics Deep Dive

So how did the numbers back up how this run felt? Let’s take a closer look at the lap-by-lap data to see what story my watch was telling while I was out there getting it done:

Line chart showing lap-by-lap heart rate, pace, and effort ratio from July 22, 2025 Easy Run. Heart rate gradually increases across five laps, pace remains steady, and effort ratio shows a slight upward trend, confirming aerobic Zone 2 consistency.
  • ❤️ Heart Rate: A gentle upward trend – likely due to cardiac drift, not overexertion.
  • 🕐 Pace: Surprisingly even. Less than 15 seconds variance across laps.
  • ⚖️ Effort Ratio: HR per unit pace climbed modestly, showing aerobic strain, not overload.

Interpretation:
This data confirms a textbook Zone 2 execution. I stayed within aerobic thresholds while letting my body dictate pace. A solid, formful outing that built aerobic endurance without pushing the redline.

Zone 2 Refresher:
Easy runs target 60–70% of your max HR. They develop endurance and fat-burning efficiency. This type of training is a quiet powerhouse – improving mitochondria, recovery, and longevity without crushing your legs.


🧠 Takeaways

  • You respected the spirit of the workout, even with a bit of pace drift.
  • That coasty feeling? That’s a byproduct of fitness catching up to effort.
  • The run served its purpose without fatiguing you ahead of tomorrow’s time trial.
  • This is what Zone 2 mastery looks like.

🧭 Wrapping It Up

Another successful Zone 2 easy run in the books. While my brain wanted to rush ahead to the next workout, my body reminded me to stay present-and rewarded me with flow, strength, and confidence.

One step at a time. That’s how fitness is built.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top