Why are My Garmin and Strava Race Predictors so far off? I asked AI.

The Conundrum That Sparked a Deep Dive

Comic-style illustration of a bald, middle-aged man with a gray beard wearing a Garmin watch on his left wrist, seated at a desk, scratching his head while looking at a computer displaying race prediction graphs for Garmin, Strava, and AI

You lace up, track your training, put in the klicks or miles, and check your devices hoping for some feedback. And then you see it: your Garmin race predictor says you could run a sub-2 hour half marathon, while Strava suggests you’ll be closer to 2:20.

So who’s right? Or are they both wrong?

I asked AI for its predictions, using values collected from my Training Peaks metrics.

📊 Side-by-Side: Garmin vs Strava

Let’s look at what each platform predicted for me (July 2025):

Strava Predictions:

5K: 28:25 (5:41/km)
10K: 1:00:11 (6:01/km)
Half: 2:20:37 (6:40/km)
Full: 5:22:24 (7:38/km)

Strava performance prediction screen showing estimated race times for 5K, 10K, Half, and Marathon distances.

Garmin Predictions:

5K: 25:55 (5:11/km)
10K: 53:47 (5:22/km)
Half: 1:59:15 (5:39/km)
Full: 4:06:43 (5:51/km)

Garmin watch display showing race predictor with estimated finish times from 5K to Marathon.

🧠 Why Are They So Different?

📊 Strava: Reality-Based, But Conservative

Strava predicts race times using your recent pace, grade-adjusted pace (GAP), and training load. It tends to underestimate performance unless you’ve logged races or hard efforts.

🧬 Garmin: Physiological Potential

Garmin’s estimates rely on VO2 max, heart rate, and training load, which means it often assumes you’ll race in ideal conditions. If you wear a chest strap regularly (I do), Garmin’s numbers get even bolder.

Summary:

Garmin = Best-case scenario
Strava = What your workouts suggest today

But neither gives a complete picture.

🏋️‍♂️ Enter: The Plus50Fit Predictor

Here is what AI prediction model using my actual TrainingPeaks metrics:

rTSS (Run Training Stress Score)
IF (Intensity Factor)
Pa:HR (decoupling)
RPE (perceived effort)
Long-run endurance trends

Here’s what my model says as of July 3, 2025:

Distance	Plus50Fit Predicted Time	Avg Pace
5K	27:30	5:30/km
10K	58:00	5:48/km
Half	2:12:00	6:16/km
Full	4:48:00	6:50/km

These estimates reflect actual effort, aerobic durability, and training stage (currently in Base Phase 2, Week 3). They sit comfortably between the extremes of Garmin and Strava.

🔄 Visualizing the Differences

Line graph comparing Garmin, Strava, and Plus50Fit race predictions across 5K, 10K, Half, and Full Marathon distances.

Strava flattens expectations.
Garmin overreaches.
Plus50Fit meets you where your legs and lungs actually are.

📊 What My Numbers Have Saying

Pa:HR under 5% on long runs = strong aerobic base
IF near 0.90 on threshold work = tempo readiness
RPE self-assessment matches metrics = high training accuracy
Training volume rising gradually = sustainable buildup

Translation: Building smart, and the Plus50Fit numbers will sharpen monthly.

✅ So Which Prediction Should I Trust?

Use Case	Trust This Predictor
Everyday training	Strava
VO2 trend check	Garmin
Race goal setting	Plus50Fit Predictor (Yup!)

🌟 Final Thoughts

Neither Garmin nor Strava is wrong—they’re just answering different questions.

Garmin says: “Here’s what you might do at your absolute best.”
Strava says: “Here’s what your workouts show today.”
Plus50Fit says: “Here’s what your heart, legs, and lungs are actually capable of right now.”

Ready to find out which one wins on race day? I’ll keep updating this model as training continues.